This is the followup from the April 20,2017 Orlando Sentinel article. Here is my affidavit that will explain in detail what was written sparingly about.
The affidavit was given to the Florida Senate. I later testified before them. It will explain what has compelled me to speak out, write and protest the issue of parents not being allowed to have any meaningful and impactful role in their child’s education.
The philosophy of the classroom for one generation will be the philosophy of the government in the next.
My name is Hamilton Boone and I have provided a sworn affidavit concerning the Materials Challenge Process/Policy in the Brevard County School District. The following is my testimony concerning that process/policy. I want to make it perfectly clear, that I am not trying to ban any books from any schools or any libraries. What I am trying to do, is change the flawed policy and procedure for parents challenging material in school. Parents want a meaningful and impactful role in deciding the material that their child is exposed to. The Materials Challenge Process/Policy was originally designed for parents, but as you will see, parents were left absolutely powerless and in fact blocked from participation.
Beginning in the fall of 2015, my wife, Penny and I became aware of a book that was readily available to students at our son’s high school, Satellite High School and DeLaura Middle School, which share a library. The work of fiction is entitled, “Beloved” by Toni Morrison. Her name caught my attention, because of another one of her novels entitled, THE BLUEST EYES, in which the pedophiliac is presented as a loving and tender man. Today, you will find multiple copies of THE BLUEST EYES on the shelf in my son’s AP English class.
In the fall of 2015, I made an appointment, along with my wife, to speak to the principle, Mr. Elliott, and the AP English teacher to discuss “Beloved”. The meeting was cordial. I expressed my concern that this type of fictional work was in our schools. I would not of known this type of pornographic material was available to my son and other children if I had not know of Morrison’s other work. I then read some of the objectionable material found in this “literary” work. Remember, this book is in a shared library of kids 12-18 years old. For example:
These excerpts are from the first 127 pages of the 324 page novel.
And so they were: Paul D Garner, Paul F Garner, Paul A Garner, Halle Suggs and Sixo, the wild man. All in their twenties, minus women, fucking cows, dreaming of rape, thrashing on pallets, rubbing their thighs and waiting for the new girl- the one who took Baby Sugg’s place after Halle bought her with five years of Sundays.
“As she raised up from the heat she felt Paul D behind her and his hands under her breasts…Behind her, bending down, his body an arc of kindness, he held her breasts in the palm of his hands…And when the top of her dress was around her hips…”
“A stair step before him, was Baby Suggs replacement, the new girl they dreamed of at night and fucked cows for at dawn while waiting for her to choose”
” Seth lay on her back, her head turned from him. Out of the corner of his eye, Paul D saw the float of her breast and disliked it, the spread away, flat roundness of them that he could definitely live without, never mind that downstairs he had held them as though they were the most expensive part of himself.”
” Seth smiled at her and Halle’ s stupidity. Even the cows new and came to look. Uncrossing her ankles, she managed not to laugh aloud.”
” The jump, thought Paul D, from a calf to a girl wasn’t all that mighty… and taking her in the corn rather than her quarters, a yard away from the cabins of the others who had lost out, was a gesture of tenderness. Halle wanted privacy for her and got public display. Who could miss a ripple in a cornfield on a quite cloudless day?… It was hard, hard, hard sitting there erect as dogs watching the cornstalks dance at noon.”
kneeling in the mist they waited for the whim of the guard, or two, or three. Or maybe all of them wanted it. Water it from one prisoner in particular or none–or all.
” Breakfast? Want some breakfast, nigger?”
” Yes, sir.”
” Hungry, nigger?”
” Yes, sir.”
” Here you go.”
Occasionally a kneeling man chose a gunshot in his head as the price, maybe, of taking a bit of foreskin with him to Jesus. He was looking at his palsied hands, smelling the guard, listening to his soft grunts so like doves’, as he stood before the man kneeling in his midst “.
The teacher then explained the thinking in choosing “Beloved”; “Beloved is offered as a model for students to understand why they (Black Americans), feel the way they do today”.
Astounding! How a work of fiction, set over 150 years ago in pre-Civil War, graphically depicting black on black crimes, bestiality, sodomy, incest, rape, infanticide, murder and pedophilia, is pertinent to understanding how “they feel today”, is beyond my comprehension. This sounded like a personal agenda instead.
Additionally, the Florida Today/USA Today policy says, “..reserves the right to suspend users and/or remove comments that.., (contain) Obscenities, vulgarities or any variation of such that suggests, connotes or contains indecent, offensive or lewd speech.”
Also, I would be excourted from the monthly School Board meeting if I attempted to read this as it contains indecent material, yet it is ok for kids to read.
My wife and I were told the book would remain. Mr. Elliott encouraged us to the drop the issue, but we said we could not agree and asked what other steps we may take. Mr. Elliott said that after filling out the necessary forms we could present our thoughts to a “impartial” committee. We reviewed the process and found there are 2 committees; the 1st with 6 members and the 2nd with 13 members. If we decided to appeal, we would next meet with the “impartial” committee of 13. We discovered that all of the “impartial” committee members, worked with Mr. Elliott, had previous ties to Mr. Elliott or SHS, or was a student of the teacher, or a member of the Brevard County School District administration. Not too “impartial from our view.
I asked Mr. Elliott, as he had done so many times before, to do a school wide call or email to all parents associated with SHS or to inform them of this issue. An issue that was to be in the Sunshine. Mr. Elliott refused, without any reason for doing so.
In a couple of weeks, the teacher and myself gave our individual views to the committee of 6 concerning “Beloved”. As expected, the vote was 6-0 against us. The next committee meeting was a real eye-opener for me. Although all school businesses to be conducted in the Sunshine, including both committee meetings, the exact opposite happened.
Before the 2nd committee meeting, we discovered that a member of the committee had met privately with the teacher to “better understand her thoughts”. Additionally, SHS teachers had met with each other concerning “Beloved”. This was done without our knowledge or presence.Although I asked to meet with the committee member whom had met with the teacher, that was denied. Once again, the “impartial” committee members, either worked with or had previous ties to Mr. Elliott or SHS, was a student of of the teacher or a member of the Brevard County School District administration.
At the 2nd committee meeting, my wife started to record the meeting with our camera so that an accurate transcription could be made. In no uncertain terms, a member of the district administration, Mrs. VanMeter, ordered her not to record. I came in shortly after, not knowing this, and proceeded to record on my phone. Mrs. VanMeter also ordered me to quit recording. I reminded her that this was a public meeting and that is to be done in the sunshine. She refused to relent in ordering us not to record. Penny and I were concerned that security would be called so we acquiesced to her order. As predicted we lost 13-0.
I have heard stories of parents not liking the age-inappropriate material being taught, but afraid to speak out due to persecution or ostracizing of the children.
I spoke to my school board representative, Amy Kneessy and explained that the Materials Challenge Process is totally flawed and anti-parent. In the Materials Challenge Process, parents are not allowed to provide meaningful and impactful input. The opposite is true! Parents are blocked from doing so, with the outcome decided completely by the School District.
Amy met with myself and Tina Descovich. Tina was running for Amy’s termed out seat, and now is the new school board representative for my district. I brought 28 suggestions of how to make the Materials Challenge Process, the parent centered process it was originally meant to be. Amy presented these suggestions to the new Superintendent, Mr. Desmond Blackburn.
The very next week, I arrange a meeting with Mr Blackburn. My wife and I met with him at his district office. I was excited to meet Mr. Blackburn because in his interviews, and in his slide presentations, he professed the importance of parents being involved in their children’s education. His actions have not match his rhetoric.
As soon as Penny and I sat down, he asked if we intended to ban books and I answered absolutely not. We wanted parents genuinely involved in this process and our recent experience is that we were blocked from doing so. He told Penny and I that he had handpicked a group to go over the revision of the Materials Challenge Process/Policy. He seemed rushed and we were led out.
The next day I emailed him and thanked him for meeting with us. I added that since Penny and I are the only parents to go through this process completely, that either one of us would like to volunteer to help. Either one of us would be an excellent resource, especially considering we were the only parents to go completely through the process.
For the next 2 months, I sent multiple emails and left multiple phone messages at his office, asking about being part of the “Blackburn hand-picked group”. Literally, on the 60th day, he finally came to the phone and I asked him to be part of this group, and without explanation, emphatically answered NO! There was no explanation given.
Later, I came to discover that the “Blackburn handpicked group” was Blackburn and 2 immediate staff members. No Parents involved in the review of a policy and procedure specifically meant for parents!
There was fraud and obfuscation by Mr. Blackburn and his hand picked group, from formulating survey questions to get the answers he wanted, to ignoring questions that didn’t give him the answers he wanted, to sending out the sham survey, to email addresses being changed so parents wouldn’t receive the sham survey.
In actuality, nothing was changed in the process whatsoever. The many suggestions that were brought forward by Amy, Tina and myself to have parents more involved, were all ignored, or more accurately, blocked!
Through Mr. Blackburn’s actions, I have determined that he is an elitist and has an agenda where parents do not play the primary role in their child’s education. His focus is to immerse our kids in materials that are age-inappropriate, in direct opposition to the parent’s values, while overruling parents wishes in these and other matters.
By Mr. Blackburn’s actions, he has continually demonstrated that he is Anti-Parent and an Authoritarian. He has demonstrated a zest for implementing an agenda that is in direct opposition to parent’s values. His condescending attitude towards parents and seemingly knowing what is best for my child and other parent’s children, is at best, dangerous. In my dealings with Mr. Blackburn, I have found him to be self-absorbed, out of touch and unresponsive. I now understand why there were walkouts in South Florida when he was there.
Please help make the Materials Challenge Process a pro parent, pro child tool for parents to be deeply involved in the education of their children.
C. Hamilton Boone